<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Investorial Site Redesign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://investorial.com/editors-notes/investorial-site-redesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://investorial.com/editors-notes/investorial-site-redesign/</link>
	<description>Investments + Editorials: Dissecting the good, the bad, and the ugly of investment / financial media!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://investorial.com/editors-notes/investorial-site-redesign/#comment-601</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investorial.com/editors-notes/investorial-site-redesign/#comment-601</guid>
		<description>I dunno..... seems that if you're going to choose a style that forces 1024X768 screen size, you could drop a font size. For those of us using smaller screens, you might wish to narrow the space given to advertising ("Ads by Google") and devote more space to your content.

DAvid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno&#8230;.. seems that if you&#8217;re going to choose a style that forces 1024X768 screen size, you could drop a font size. For those of us using smaller screens, you might wish to narrow the space given to advertising (&#8221;Ads by Google&#8221;) and devote more space to your content.</p>
<p>DAvid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://investorial.com/editors-notes/investorial-site-redesign/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 06:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investorial.com/editors-notes/investorial-site-redesign/#comment-593</guid>
		<description>Why did the design take all day?  I did all the hardwork - you just copied it from &lt;a href="http://www.insidewii.net" rel="nofollow"&gt;InsideWii.net&lt;/a&gt;.  Nice try though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did the design take all day?  I did all the hardwork - you just copied it from <a href="http://www.insidewii.net" rel="nofollow">InsideWii.net</a>.  Nice try though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Style Sheet?</title>
		<link>http://investorial.com/editors-notes/investorial-site-redesign/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Style Sheet?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 05:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investorial.com/editors-notes/investorial-site-redesign/#comment-591</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry, but your blog design seems a little reminiscent of something that was unveiled by Ben Bleikamp just a little bit ago.  Did he design this for you or did you just grab the stylesheet from him.  Seeing as how your stylesheet is structured the exact same as his, it's very suspicious.

I don't want to bring up what happened in the past, but you should know better than this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but your blog design seems a little reminiscent of something that was unveiled by Ben Bleikamp just a little bit ago.  Did he design this for you or did you just grab the stylesheet from him.  Seeing as how your stylesheet is structured the exact same as his, it&#8217;s very suspicious.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to bring up what happened in the past, but you should know better than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
