More On Jim Cramer

2 May 2006
Bookmark and Share

After my previous blog on Jim Cramer, you may feel that I have a strong opinion of the person and the show. I thought I should perhaps sit through an entire show of Mad Money to justify my decision, and guess which show I saw? It was funny watching the students at the University of Michigan egg on Jim; turning the show into a financial version of Jerry Springer with all the hooting, hollering and let’s not forget the booyahs.

Obviously my opinion has not changed regarding Cramer. But I realized that Cramer is like a durian. For those who don’t know, the durian is a tropical fruit I loved eating as a child. You won’t find anybody without a strong opinion of it. Fans will call it the king of fruits, while others will call it the stinkiest thing they’ve ever smelled. There are simply no middle-ground opinions.

If I’m blogging negatively about Cramer, some people must be liking him right? I searched and found Frank Barnako’s blog about 3 Cramer fan sites. For those who don’t know Frank, he is a CBS MarketWatch editor/exec. I am a long-time reader of Frank’s MarketWatch columns and wish Frank good luck in becoming a blogger

I enjoyed the comment thread on Frank’s blog. Jim Cramer certainly has his supporters and detractors. Most enjoyable of all was the comment by Asher Z. Haft of Merdian Capital Group. I always thought I’d remember everything about The Intelligent Investor, until I was humbled by Asher’s comment:

On page 16 it speaks about Jim Cramer and the “spectacular” performance of his favorite picks made in February 2000. The book states “By year-end 2002, 1 of the 10 had already gone bankrupt, and a $10,000 investment spread equally across Cramer’s picks would have lost 94%, leaving you with a grand total of $597.44.

Loyal viewers of the show will often see Jim recommend one stock and a few weeks later chastize the same stock into his “House of Pain”. Jim Cramer’s style is a trader, he works with momentum and has a gift of seeing where the market is going in the short-term period. But investors who are looking to invest in companies that stand the test of time would be better served by staying away from his emotional roller-coaster-like advice.

  • MH
    I am not an economist, so bear with me, please. To help mortgagees, what's wrong with letting EVERYONE refinance to 4.25% rate with the goverment paying a fixed fee of some sort to the lenders? I was surprised to see that my current 6.625 rate would save about 20% on the payment. In addition, it would solve the problem of my upcoming end of an adjustable rate. The LIBOR rate has dropped so much that 4.25% is fair to everyone. Peope who had no mortgage would be able to mortgage their houses also. If someone's mortgauege is 'under water', then make an additional loan for that difference bqsed on the property's new appraisal at 80% of current value. Have a payment due on a sliding scale if the house is sold. Somehow all these Tarp funds could play a part in all of this.
blog comments powered by Disqus