http://investorial.com/editors-notes/my-editorial-on-blogging-stockss-sheldon-liber/ Investments + Editorials: Dissecting the good, the bad, and the ugly of investment / financial media! Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:30:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://investorial.com/editors-notes/my-editorial-on-blogging-stockss-sheldon-liber/#comment-894 ricemutt Tue, 11 Jul 2006 03:54:36 +0000 http://investorial.com/editors-notes/my-editorial-on-blogging-stockss-sheldon-liber/#comment-894 I don't follow his writings, but I perused the article in question. I have to assume he's trying to being witty and tongue-in-cheek; at least the first half of his article could be interpreted to mean that he thinks GOOG is overvalued and a similar $ could buy several operations with more concrete assets that would be better investments. That's ok, its his opinion. The second half of the article loses me though. I hope he's just carrying his attempt at being witty a tad too far. If he's being serious at all, then I can only agree with your comments, as well as that most of the advice out there in the blogosphere can be pretty bad and self-serving. I don’t follow his writings, but I perused the article in question. I have to assume he’s trying to being witty and tongue-in-cheek; at least the first half of his article could be interpreted to mean that he thinks GOOG is overvalued and a similar $ could buy several operations with more concrete assets that would be better investments. That’s ok, its his opinion. The second half of the article loses me though. I hope he’s just carrying his attempt at being witty a tad too far. If he’s being serious at all, then I can only agree with your comments, as well as that most of the advice out there in the blogosphere can be pretty bad and self-serving.

]]>